Caputi v. Topper Realty Corp. et al
Doreen Caputi |
Brian Topper, Marilyn Topper, Sharon Topper and Topper Realty Corp. |
2:2014cv02634 |
April 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Joseph F. Bianco |
William D. Wall |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Discovery and denying 46 Motion to Strike. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part, and Plaintiff's motion is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 7/9/2015. (Walsh, Kenneth) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion to Compel. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Defendants' motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 5/22/2015. (Bagnuola, Anthony) |
Filing 31 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke: Motion hearing held on 2/12/2015. For the reasons set forth on the record, Defendant's motion 26 is granted in part and denied in part; Defendant's motion 28, to strike is denied. See attached Order for additional directives and deadlines. (Tape #2:07-2:40; 2:48-2:54.) (Gandiosi, Kristin) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.