In Re Canon Inkjet Printer Litigation
Sarah Barrett and Melanie Clark |
Canon U.S.A., Inc. |
Marcus Ho and Michael Robertson |
2:2014cv03235 |
May 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Steven I Locke |
Leonard D Wexler |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 Letter to Judge Wexler Regarding Status by Sarah Barrett, Melanie Clark, Marcus Ho (Federman, William) |
Filing 29 Letter re: Status by Sarah Barrett (Federman, William) |
|
Filing 27 Letter to Judge Wexler Regarding Status by Sarah Barrett, Melanie Clark, Marcus Ho (Federman, William) |
|
Filing 26 Joint MOTION to Stay (Letter Requesting Temporary Stay) by Sarah Barrett, Melanie Clark, Marcus Ho. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Federman, William) |
Filing 25 Letter to Judge Wexler requesting a pre-motion conference by Canon U.S.A., Inc. (Silberberg, Richard) |
Filing 24 NOTICE by Canon U.S.A., Inc. to Withdraw as Co-Counsel for Defendant (Manson, Robert) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Overs on behalf of Marcus Ho (aty to be noticed) (Overs, Peter) |
Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Consolidated) against Canon U.S.A., Inc., filed by Sarah Barrett, Marcus Ho, Melanie Clark. (Federman, William) |
|
Filing 20 STIPULATION Proposed Stipulated Discovery Confidentiality and Protective Order by Canon U.S.A., Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Silberberg, Richard) |
|
|
Case Consolidated. (Fagan, Linda) |
Filing 17 Letter regarding Consolidated Class Action Complaint and appointment of co-lead counsel by Sarah Barrett (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Stipulation and Order Regarding Filing of Consolidated Class Action Complaint, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Appointing Co-Lead Counsel) (Federman, William) |
Filing 16 Letter to Judge Wexler by Canon U.S.A., Inc. (Silberberg, Richard) |
Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steven I Locke. Magistrate Judge William D. Wall no longer assigned to the case. (Greene, Donna) |
Filing 15 Letter Regarding Pre-Motion Conference by Sarah Barrett (Federman, William) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by James K. Langdon on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Langdon, James) |
Filing 13 Notice of Related Case 14CV 4255 Ho v. Canon U.S.A, Inc. (McMorrow, Karen) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin P. Davenport on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Davenport, Erin) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Shari L. Aberle on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Aberle, Shari) |
|
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 25, receipt number 0207-7050445. by Canon U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit in Support of Shari L. J. Aberle, # 2 Proposed Order) (Aberle, Shari) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 25, receipt number 0207-7050246. by Canon U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit in Support of Erin P. Davenport, # 2 Proposed Order) (Davenport, Erin) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 25, receipt number 0207-7050118. by Canon U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit in Support Affidavit of James K. Langdon, # 2 Proposed Order) (Langdon, James) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Gregory Manson on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Manson, Robert) |
|
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re # 1 Complaint, Stipulation and Order Extending Defendant's Time to Respond to Complaint by Canon U.S.A., Inc.. (Silberberg, Richard) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard H. Silberberg on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Silberberg, Richard) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Barrett. Canon U.S.A., Inc. served on 6/2/2014, answer due 6/23/2014. (Federman, William) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Canon U.S.A., Inc., on 05/27/2014. (Fagan, Linda) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf . You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences . Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (McMorrow, Karen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Canon U.S.A., Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-6949308 Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Sarah Barrett. (Attachments: # 1 1 - Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 2 - Proposed Summons) (Federman, William) |
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. The following corrections were made: party text added to plaintiff,, county changed to outside home statem, arbitration code changed to blank. (McMorrow, Karen) |
Case assigned to Judge Leonard D. Wexler and Magistrate Judge William D. Wall. (McMorrow, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.