Francis v. Kings Park Manor, Inc. et al
| Donahue Francis |
| Corrine Downing, Raymond Endres and Kings Park Manor, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv03555 |
| June 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Gary R. Brown |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss - As noted above, on July 16, 2014, the Clerk of the Court noted the default of Endres. There having been no activity on the docket as to Endres since that date, the Court permits the Plaintiff to file a motion for default judgment against Endres on or before May 1, 2015. Should the Plaintiff fail to do so or to move for an extension, the Court will dismiss this action as against Endres for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/16/2015. (Coleman, Laurie) (Main Document 28 replaced on 3/16/2015) (Coleman, Laurie). Modified on 3/16/2015; The Decision has been replaced and the docket text modified to correct a clerical error; The 2nd sentence in the last paragraph of page 29 should state that "the Court permits the Plaintiff to file a motion for default judgment", not "the Court permit the Plaintiff to file a default judgment". (Coleman, Laurie).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
