Figueroa v. RSquared NY, Inc. et al
| Marlen Figueroa |
| Ain "Doe", Altaf Hirji and RSquared NY, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv04390 |
| July 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
DECISION AND ORDER: The Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Strike the Defendants' first, second, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh affirmative defenses is denied in its entirety. Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 6/26/2015. c/m by cm/ecf. (Mahon, Cinthia)
|
|
Filing
9
DECISION AND ORDER - Based on the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' 6 motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint is granted in part and dismissed in part. The motion is granted as to (1) Plaintiffs sex discrimination claim aga inst RSquared NY; (2) the Plaintiffs Title VII claims against Hirji and Ain Doe; and (3) the Plaintiffs NYSHRL claim against Hirji. The claims that may move forward are the quid pro quo sexual harassment claim under Title VII and the NYSHRL against RSquared NY and the NYSHRL claim against Ain Doe. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate Hirji as a defendant. Defendant Altaf Hirji terminated. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/3/2015. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
