Paduano et al v. Express Scripts, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: HM Compounding Services, LLC, Nick Canner, Victor Paduano and Frank Scala
Defendant: OptumRx, Inc., Express Scripts, Inc., CVS Caremark Corp. and Prime Therapeutics LLC
Case Number: 2:2014cv05376
Filed: September 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Arlene R. Lindsay
Presiding Judge: Arthur D. Spatt
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 108 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER; In sum, the Court denies Caremarks motion to strike in its entirety Camhis declaration submitted in support of HMCs opposition to Caremarks motion to sever HMCs claims against Caremark and to compel arbitration of t hose claims. (Doc No. 91). The Court grants in part and denies in part Caremarks motion to sever HMCs claims against it and to compel arbitration of those claims (Doc No. 29). The Court grants in part and denies in part Optums motion to sever HMCs claims against it and to compel arbitration of those claims. (Doc No. 38). The Court also grants in part and denies in part Primes motion to sever HMCs claims against it and to compel arbitration of those claims. (Doc No. 59.) The Court grants ESIs m otion to sever HMCs claims against it and transfer those claims to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and the forum selection clause in the ESI Provider Agreement. (Doc No. 11) . The Court stays the entire action, including the claims brought by the Individual Plaintiffs, pursuant to Section 3 of the FAA. The Court denies HMCs letter motion dated October 14, 2014 (Doc No. 99) without prejudice for the reasons explained in P art II(6) of this Memorandum of Decision and Order. Finally, that part of the October 3, 2014 TRO applicable to the Individual Plaintiffs will remain in place pending arbitration, and that part of the October 3, 2014 TRO applicable to HMC is extended until such time as the respective arbitrator hears and determines any application for injunctive relief. Any requests to revisit the terms should be directed to the appropriate arbitrator, or, with respect to ESI, the federal district court in Misso uri.The Court recognizes that severing HMCs claims against Caremark, Optum, and Prime and submitting them to arbitration and severing and transferring HMCs claims against ESI to the federal district court in Missouri may lead to inconsistent results. Further, if one or more of the arbitrators deems the relevant Provider Agreement to be contracts of adhesion or finds that HMCs respective claims are not arbitrable, HMC would only have the opportunity to start at square one in this Court. It is alw ays more expeditious to try related claims in one forum rather than several, but allowing efficiency and economy to rule the day would effectively swallow Atlantic Marines holding in every case with multiple defendants. Valspar Corp., 2014 WL 1607584 , at *4. Furthermore, the Court finds that HMC, a sophisticated corporate entity, assumed these risks when it entered into the relevant arbitration provisions and forum selection clause. See "Decision" for further details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 10/27/2014. (Coleman, Laurie)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paduano et al v. Express Scripts, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OptumRx, Inc.
Represented By: Dai Wai Chin Feman
Represented By: Christopher George Karagheuzoff
Represented By: Richard H. Silberberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Express Scripts, Inc.
Represented By: Ally Hack
Represented By: Sarah Hellmann
Represented By: Jason Husgen
Represented By: Menachem J. Kastner
Represented By: Christopher Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Caremark Corp.
Represented By: Yonaton Aronoff
Represented By: Robert Griffith
Represented By: Michael D. Leffel
Represented By: Connor A. Sabatino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prime Therapeutics LLC
Represented By: Peter Joseph Fazio
Represented By: Jill M. Wheaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HM Compounding Services, LLC
Represented By: Jessica M. Baquet
Represented By: Shannon E. Boettjer
Represented By: Stanley A. Camhi
Represented By: Steven R. Schlesinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nick Canner
Represented By: Jessica M. Baquet
Represented By: Shannon E. Boettjer
Represented By: Stanley A. Camhi
Represented By: Steven R. Schlesinger
Represented By: Daniel E. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victor Paduano
Represented By: Jessica M. Baquet
Represented By: Shannon E. Boettjer
Represented By: Stanley A. Camhi
Represented By: Steven R. Schlesinger
Represented By: Daniel E. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Scala
Represented By: Jessica M. Baquet
Represented By: Shannon E. Boettjer
Represented By: Stanley A. Camhi
Represented By: Steven R. Schlesinger
Represented By: Daniel E. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?