Radisson Hotels International, Inc. v. Radisson Cars & Limo, Inc. et al
| Radisson Hotels International, Inc. |
| Radisson Cars & Limo, Inc. and Hajiasif A. Usman |
| 2:2014cv05927 |
| October 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Gary R. Brown |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ADOPTION ORDER - On March 1, 2017, Judge Brown issued a 22 report (the R&R) recommending that the Plaintiffs 19 motion for default judgment be granted; that a permanent injunction be issued against the Defendants; and that the Court endorse the P laintiffs proposed order after striking paragraphs 12 and 13. The Plaintiff provided proof of service of the R&R on March 3, 2017. It has been more than fourteen days since the service of the R&R, and the parties have not filed objections. As such, p ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. See Coburn v. P.N. Fin., No. 13-CV-1006 (ADS) (SIL), 2015 WL 520346, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2015) (reviewing Report and Recommendation without objections for clear error). Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for the Plaintiff in accordance with the R&R, and to close this case. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/21/2017. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - On February 25, 2016, Judge Brown issued a report recommending that the Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment be denied without prejudice to renew following the provision of a memorandum of law and appro priate evidentiary support consistent with the applicable rules (the R&R). It has been more than fourteen days since the service of the R&R, and the parties have not filed objections. As such, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of C ivil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the February 19, 2016 R&R for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. See Coburn v. P.N. Fin., No. 13-CV-1006 (ADS) (SIL), 2015 WL 520346, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2015) (reviewing Report and Recommendation without objections for clear error). Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for further details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/17/2016. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
