McFadden v. Cuomo
Petitioner: Reginald G. McFadden
Respondent: Andrew Cuomo
Case Number: 2:2015cv00119
Filed: February 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM & ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE AS SUCCESSIVE PETITION; This Court transfers this case to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. For the foregoing reasons, McFadden's habeas corpus petition is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is r espectfully directed to transfer this Petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Upon transfer of this petition, the Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case. If the Second Circui t authorizes Petitioner to proceed in this matter, Petitioner shall move to reopen this docket number. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on Petitioner and to note such service on the docket. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 12/15/2015. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
February 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the Court has conducted an initial review of this Petition and has determined that this Petition should not be summarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 4. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve, by electronic transmission, a copy of this Order, the underlying Petition, and Supporting Affidavit, on the Attorney General of the State of New York, the attorney for the Respondent. ORDERED that Respondent shall file a limited answer to the Petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order addressing the issue of whether Petitioner must first seek permission from the Court o f Appeals in order to file this Petition in the District Court; If Respondent concedes that the Petition is properly filed in this Court, Respondent shall file a complete and entire answer to the Petition within sixty (60) days of the date of this O rder. In such case, Respondent shall prepare the state court record to be produced and filed with the Court. No reply is required, however, should Petitioner want to reply, he shall serve a reply on Respondent's counsel and with the Court within thirty (30) days of his receipt of the answer. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/12/2015. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McFadden v. Cuomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Andrew Cuomo
Represented By: Paul B. Lyons
Represented By: NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By: Judith R. Sternberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reginald G. McFadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?