Jefferson v. Police Officer, Cope Unit 34 et al
Kevin L. Jefferson |
County of Suffolk, Koenig and Police Officer, Cope Unit 34 |
2:2015cv00544 |
February 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Joanna Seybert |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS Judge Shields' R&R (Docket Entry 23) in its entirety. Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Docket Entry 20) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 filed in the Consolidated Cases (No. 15-CV-2303, Docket Entry 9; No. 15-CV-2304, Docket Entry 9; and No. 15-CV-2305, Docket Entry 11) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants' proposed briefing schedule for their renewed motion to dismiss the Consolidated Cases (see Docket Entry 25) is APPROVED. Defendants shall file and serve their motion to dismiss on or before April 3, 2017; Plaintiff shall file and serve his respon se on or before May 1, 2017; Defendants shall file and serve their reply, if any, on or before May 15, 2017. Plaintiff's claim against Officer Dubriske is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk of the Court is directed to TERMINATE Officer D ubriske as a defendant in this action. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Plaintiff. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order w ould not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 3/7/2017. C/M; C/ECF Associated Cases: 2:15-cv-00544-JS-AYS, 2:15-cv-02303-JS-ARL, 2:15-cv-02304- JS-ARL, 2:15-cv-02305-JS-ARL (Valle, Christine) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's claim against Police Officer Koenig is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's claim against Police Officer Dubriske is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and with leave to replead. If Plaintiff wishes to replead his claim against Officer Dubriske, he must do so within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. If he fails to do so, his claim against Officer Dubriske will be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claim against the County with respect to the Complaint Policy is DISMISSE D WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's remaining claims are against Officer Umbarila and against the County with respect to the Panhandling Policy. The Court sua sponte Orders that Jefferson v. Koenig, No. 15-CV-0544, Jefferson v. Salvatore, et. al., No . 15-CV-2303, Jefferson v. Loe, et. al., No. 15-CV-2304, and Jefferson v. Soe, et. al., No. 15-CV-2305, be CONSOLIDATED. All future filings are to be docketed in the earliest-filed case, Jefferson v. Koenig, No. 15-CV-0544. Upon consolidation, the Cl erk of the Court is directed to mark case numbers 15-CV-2303, 15-CV-2304, and 15-CV-2305, CLOSED. Given Plaintiffs' pro se status, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum and Order would n ot be taken in good faith and therefore forma pauperis status is DENIED for purposes of an appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to TERMINATE Police Officer Koenig as a defendant in this matter. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/15/2016. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and the Court ORDERS service of the Summonses and Complaint upon the Defendants by the USMS. The Clerk of the Court is further ORDERED to serve a copy of the Complaint together with this Order on the Suffolk County Attorney and the Suffolk County Attorney's Office is requested to attempt to ascertain the full na me of the unidentified Suffolk County Police Officer. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 4/6/2015. (Valle, Christine) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.