Vallen v. Beau Plan et al
Plaintiff: Barry Vallen
Defendant: Dr. Roger Beau Plan, Dr. Leoncia Carlotta and Dr. Bilal Khan
Case Number: 2:2015cv00703
Filed: February 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Arlene R. Lindsay
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry 20) is GRANTED and the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants' req uest for an order barring Plaintiff from filing additional lawsuits against Pilgrim or its employees is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Plaintiff. Given Plaintiff& #039;s pro se status, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for purposes of an appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/14/2017. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
February 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry 10) is GRANTED IN PART and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to FED R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT within thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3 ) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/4/2016. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vallen v. Beau Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Roger Beau Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Leoncia Carlotta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Bilal Khan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barry Vallen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?