Daytree at Cortland Square, Inc. et al v. Walsh et al
Clara Datre, Thomas A. Datre, Sr. and Daytree at Cortland Square, Inc. |
Robert L. Cicale, John C. Cochrane, Steven J. Flotteron, Anthony S. Senft, Jr., The Town of Islip, Michael Torres, Edward Walsh, Michael P. Walsh and Trish Bergin Weichbrodt |
2:2015cv02298 |
April 22, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Joseph F. Bianco |
Anne Y. Shields |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 MEMORANDUM and ORDER: The Court is firmly persuaded that even after resolving all ambiguities and drawing all reasonable inferences against the moving party, a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the plaintiffs on any of the claims presented. The defendants motion 89 for summary judgment is GRANTED. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 7/28/2021. (Innelli, Michael) |
Filing 65 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants defendants' motion to dismiss the claims for declaratory and injunctive relief and all claims against the councilmember defendants (Flotteron, Cochrane, and Weichbrodt), but denies the motion in all other respects. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 8/15/2018. (Baum, Sabrina) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.