Uribe v. Smith

Uribe v. Smith

Plaintiff:	Juan Carlos Uribe
Defendant:	Brandon Smith
Case Number:	2:2015cv02312
Filed:	April 16, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bianco
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 28, 2017	Filing 17 AMENDED ORDER MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the petitioner has demonstrated no basis for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Therefore, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 7/28/2017. Copy of Amended Memorandum & Opinion mailed to plaintiff on 7/28/2017. (Consalvo, Mikayla)
July 27, 2017	Filing 15 ORDER MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the petitioner has demonstrated no basis for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Therefore, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 7/27/2017. Copy of Memorandum & Opinion mailed to plaintiff on 7/27/2017. (Consalvo, Mikayla)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 28, 2017

Filing 17 AMENDED ORDER MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the petitioner has demonstrated no basis for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Therefore, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 7/28/2017. Copy of Amended Memorandum & Opinion mailed to plaintiff on 7/28/2017. (Consalvo, Mikayla)

July 27, 2017

Filing 15 ORDER MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the petitioner has demonstrated no basis for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Therefore, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 7/27/2017. Copy of Memorandum & Opinion mailed to plaintiff on 7/27/2017. (Consalvo, Mikayla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Uribe v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Brandon Smith
Represented By:	NASSAU COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By:	NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By:	Sarah M. Spatt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Carlos Uribe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?