Honigman vs. Kimberly-Clark
Plaintiff: |
Gladys Honigman |
Defendant: |
Kimberly-Clark Corporation |
Interested Party: |
Anthony Belfiore and The Procter & Gamble Company |
Case Number: |
2:2015cv02910 |
Filed: |
May 19, 2015 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Office: |
Central Islip Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Robert M. Levy |
Presiding Judge: |
Jack B. Weinstein |
Nature of Suit: |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
January 17, 2024 |
Filing
1382
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Amended Memorandum and Order, the Court finds that the Settlement Agreement entered into by Plaintiffs and Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation satisfies all four factors under Fede ral Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e)(2) and the Grinnell factors, and thus is substantively fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court hereby affirms its 471 prior decision finally approving the Settlement Agreement and certifying the Settlement Class. In addition, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs' 442 fee application for Class Counsel's attorneys' fees and litigation expenses, and class representative incentive awards. The Court hereby approves and aw ards: (1) attorneys' fees in the amount of $3,169,335.02, (2) litigation expenses and charges in the amount of $138,331.23, and (3) class representative incentive awards of $10,000 and $5,000 to named Plaintiffs Kurtz and Honigman, respectively. These payments shall be paid by Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation to Plaintiffs and Class Counsel in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 1/17/2024. (YW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?