Schiff v. Stevens et al
Ann Marie Schiff |
Captain Brophy, Joseph Cassella, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, P.O. Michael Flood, Sargent Daniel Friesm, C.O. Martinez, Kay-Ann Porter-Campbell, Sherrill Spatz and S.C.O. Joanne Stevens |
2:2015cv03598 |
June 11, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Sandra J. Feuerstein |
A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER granting 20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons set forth herein, the State Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 20) is granted in full, and plaintiff's claims are dismissed with leave to amend. Plai ntiff must file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. The amended complaint must not include any claims that the Court has dismissed with prejudice--i.e., claims for false arrest, malicious prosecutio n, unlawful search and seizure, and excessive force in connection with the June 14, 2012 arrest; and New York state tort claims for assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, which are time-barred. Plaintiff is warned that failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice, and the case will be closed. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 1/6/2017. (Zbrozek, Alex) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.