Jackson v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al
| Leslie Jackson |
| Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Dennis Shanley |
| 2:2015cv04167 |
| July 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
SHORT FORM ORDER - Based on the foregoing, the Court, in its discretion, grants the 23 motion by Plaintiffs Counsel for leave to withdraw as counsel in this matter. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the appearances of Bri an L. Bromberg, Esq.; Jonathan R. Miller, Esq.; and Jonathan A. Fink, Esq. Further, the Court is staying this case for a period of 30 days to permit the Plaintiff to retain new counsel or advise the Court that he intends to proceed in this litigation pro se. The attorneys are directed to serve a copy of this decision to the Plaintiff via mail to his last known address and by email. If, by November 21, 2016, the Plaintiff has not appeared by newly-retained counsel or otherwise clearly indicated h is desire to proceed pro se, the Court will consider a motion by the Defendants to dismiss this action for failure to prosecute under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). Attorney Jonathan Robert Miller; Brian L. Bromberg and Jonathan Anthony Fink terminated. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 10/21/2016. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
