Grafton v. County Of Nassau et al
| Kenneth Grafton |
| County Of Nassau and Michael J. Sposato |
| 2:2015cv04563 |
| July 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Gary R. Brown |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER denying 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED that plaintiff's applications for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied and plaintiff must pay a fil ing fee in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400.00) to the Clerk of the Court on or before November 30, 2015, or this action will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to pr osecute without further notice. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court shall serve notice of entry of this order upon plaintiff as provided in Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and re cord such service on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 10/28/2015. (Florio, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
