Stemmle v. Interlake Steamship Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Stemmle v. Interlake Steamship Company

Stemmle v. Interlake Steamship Company

Plaintiff:	Thomas Charles Stemmle, Jr.
Defendant:	Interlake Steamship Company
Case Number:	2:2015cv04937
Filed:	August 21, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Anne Y. Shields
Presiding Judge:	Arthur D. Spatt
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Marine
Cause of Action:	46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 8, 2022	Filing 69 ORDER granting 65 . For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Defendant's motion for a declaratory judgment is granted. Counsel are to confer and submit an appropriate order and final judgment of notice to effectuate the holding herein. Upon review and approval thereof this matter will be closed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 8/8/2022. (Mucciaccio, Dina)
July 27, 2016	Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER denying 5 Motion to Remand; denying 6 Motion for Sanctions. For foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion to remand this case back to Nassau County Supreme Court is denied; and the Defendants cross-motion for sanctions is also denied. The case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields for discovery. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 7/27/2016. (Coleman, Laurie) Modified on 7/28/2016 (Coleman, Laurie).

Date Filed

Document Text

August 8, 2022

Filing 69 ORDER granting 65 . For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Defendant's motion for a declaratory judgment is granted. Counsel are to confer and submit an appropriate order and final judgment of notice to effectuate the holding herein. Upon review and approval thereof this matter will be closed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 8/8/2022. (Mucciaccio, Dina)

July 27, 2016

Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER denying 5 Motion to Remand; denying 6 Motion for Sanctions. For foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion to remand this case back to Nassau County Supreme Court is denied; and the Defendants cross-motion for sanctions is also denied. The case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields for discovery. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 7/27/2016. (Coleman, Laurie) Modified on 7/28/2016 (Coleman, Laurie).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stemmle v. Interlake Steamship Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Interlake Steamship Company
Represented By:	Gino Zonghetti
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Charles Stemmle, Jr.
Represented By:	Charles F Herd
Represented By:	W. Mark Lanier
Represented By:	Lawrence Paul Wilson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?