Arnold v. The Research Foundation for the State University of New York

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Arnold v. The Research Foundation for the State University of New York

Arnold v. The Research Foundation for the State University of New York

Plaintiff:	Carol Arnold
Defendant:	The Research Foundation for the State University of New York
Case Number:	2:2015cv05971
Filed:	October 16, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Steven I. Locke
Presiding Judge:	Arthur D. Spatt
Nature of Suit:	Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 20, 2016	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 motion to amend. Based on the foregoing, the Plaintiffs motion to amend is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that the Plaintiff is permitted to amend her complaint to add causes of action against the Defendant RFSUNY for interference under the FMLA and a hostile work environment under the NYSHRL; the Plaintiff is also permitted to add additional party defendants Traub, Routh, Curry and Perei ra and allege that they violated the NYSHRL by creating a hostile work environment. It is denied to the extent that the FMLA discrimination claim, the Title VII claims, ADEA claim, and the addition of Yamond, Blandi and Green as party defendants would all be futile. This case is respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke for the remainder of discovery. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 10/20/2016. (Coleman, Laurie)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 20, 2016

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 motion to amend. Based on the foregoing, the Plaintiffs motion to amend is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that the Plaintiff is permitted to amend her complaint to add causes of action against the Defendant RFSUNY for interference under the FMLA and a hostile work environment under the NYSHRL; the Plaintiff is also permitted to add additional party defendants Traub, Routh, Curry and Perei ra and allege that they violated the NYSHRL by creating a hostile work environment. It is denied to the extent that the FMLA discrimination claim, the Title VII claims, ADEA claim, and the addition of Yamond, Blandi and Green as party defendants would all be futile. This case is respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke for the remainder of discovery. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 10/20/2016. (Coleman, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arnold v. The Research Foundation for the State University of New York
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol Arnold
Represented By:	Michael Joseph Romano
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Research Foundation for the State University of New York
Represented By:	Amanda A. Maleszweski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?