Freund v. County of Nassau et al
Michael Freund |
County of Nassau, Nassau County Police Department, Nassau County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff Michael Sposato |
2:2015cv06180 |
October 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Steven I. Locke |
Leonard D. Wexler |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied inpart. Specifically, the motion is granted with respect to Plaintiff& #039;s due process, ADA andRehabilitation Act claims, and those claims are hereby dismissed. In addition, the Court findsthat Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim with respect to his Second Amendment claim, aswell as his state law claims for tortious interference with prospective contractual advantage and negligence and those claims are also dismissed sua sponte. Finally, because the Nassau County Police Department and the Nassau County Sheriff's Department are not suable entit ies, all claims against them are dismissed in their entirety. In all other respects, Defendants' motionto dismiss is denied and this action shall continue solely with respect to Plaintiffs equal protection and municipal liability claims. (Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 2/24/2017.) (Fagan, Linda) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.