State Of New York et al v. Pride Solvents & Chemical Co. Inc. et al
| Basil Seggos and State Of New York |
| 78-88 Lamar Street Realty Corp., Arthur Dhom, Sr., Arthur Dhom, Jr., Cheryl Dhom, Pride Solvents & Chemical Co. Inc. and Pride Solvents & Chemical Co. of N.Y., Inc. |
| 2:2015cv06569 |
| November 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Denis R. Hurley |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 Environmental Matters |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
305
CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of 78-88 Lamar Street Realty Corp., Pride Solvents & Chemical Co. Inc., Pride Solvents & Chemical Co. of N.Y., Inc., Arthur Dhom, Jr, Arthur Dhom, Sr, Cheryl Dhom against Covend LLC, Kean Babylon, Inc., Kew Realty, Pillbox LLC: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. The purpose of this Decree is to resolve claims set forth in the Complaint, the Amended Complaint and any other claims which could have been made by the State against the Settling Thi rd-Party Defendants with regard to the Matters Addressed, defined in Paragraph 2 below; to release the Settling Third-Party Defendants from liability for the Matters Addressed; and to provide full and complete contribution protection to the Settling Third-Party Defendants with regard to the Matters Addressed pursuant to CERCLA § l13(f)(2), 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(2). SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. So Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 3/8/2023. (JC)
|
|
Filing
236
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 230 Sua Sponte - Report and Recommendations: The Court ADOPTS the R&R's reasoning and result insofar that it recommends striking Third Party Defendant Edison Realty, LLC's answer and, accord ingly, hereby STRIKES the 114 Answer to the Third Party Complaint. The Court will not enter a default judgment at this time because the Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs' damages on its claims against Edison are contingent on the outcome of the main action against Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 8/13/2021. (Ready, John)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court reviewed the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Report and Recommendation is adopted as if set forth herein, and the motion for le ave to file a third-party complaint is granted insomuch as it applies to the ten John Does, and denied insomuch as it applies to the fifty-eight Babylon Settling Defendants. See attached Order. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 12/15/2017. (Bochner, Francesca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
