KBM Worldwide, Inc. v. Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation et al
Plaintiff: KBM Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant: Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation and Matthew Veal
Case Number: 2:2015cv07254
Filed: December 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Gary R. Brown
Presiding Judge: Sandra J. Feuerstein
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the reasons stated (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment against the Corporate Defendant as follows: defendant Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation is liable to plai ntiff KBM Worldwide, Inc. in the amount of $88,213.02. Plaintiff's claim against defendant Matthew Veal is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 4/30/2019.(c/m to pro se) (Ortiz, Grisel)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ADOPTION ORDER: On August 29, 2018, Judge Brown issued a Report & Recommendation (R&R) recommending that that the motion for default judgment be granted but that calculation of damages be deferred pending the disposition of the Plaintiffs claims ag ainst Matthew Veal. More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since service of the R&R on the Defendants, who have failed to file an objection. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the R& R for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety, and the Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment is granted. SEE ATTACHED ORDER by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 9/14/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)
February 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - No objections to Magistrate Judge Brown's 2/1/2017 Report have been filed, and the deadline to object is expired. Upon review, the Court is satisfied that the Report is not facially erroneous. Therefore Magistrate Judge Brown's Report is adopted in its entirety, and Defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 is denied. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 2/21/2017. (Tirado, Chelsea)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KBM Worldwide, Inc. v. Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation
Represented By: Robert J. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Veal
Represented By: Robert J. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KBM Worldwide, Inc.
Represented By: Richard S. Naidich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?