Bozdogan v. 23 Ludlam Fuel, Inc. et al
| Ergun Bozdogan |
| 23 Ludlam Fuel, Inc., Anton Parisi and John Parisi |
| 2:2016cv01053 |
| March 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 83 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the reasons set forth in the attached Decision and Order, Plaintiff is awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $111,807.50 and costs in the amount of $6,992.64, for a total of $118,800.14. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter an amended judgment consistent with the amounts set forth herein. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 12/29/2022. (DF)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter Judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $56,194.22, consisting of: (1) $23,097.11 in unpaid wages; (2) &# 036;23,097.11 in liquidated damages; and (3) $10,000 in statutory damages for violations of the wage and notice statement provisions of the NYLL. Prejudgment interest should be added to the total amount, to be calculated as stated above. As to the award of attorneys' fees, Plaintiff is directed to file the application for attorneys' fees and costs on or before October 1, 2022, with any opposition due on or before November 1, 2022. Furthermore, in accordance with Section 198(4) of the NYLL, if any amounts remain unpaid ninety days after the issuance of this judgment, or ninety days after expiration of the time to appeal if no appeal is then pending, whichever is later, the total amount of judgment will automatically increase by fifteen percent. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment accordingly. Please See Memorandum Decision and Order for Further Details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/15/2022. (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons (Please See Order For Further Details), Plaintiff's motion to amend the pleadings is GRANTED, and the Court hereby considers the Complaint to include claims for wage notice and wage statement violations under NYLL §§ 195(1)(a) and 195(3). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 2/22/2022. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER re 71 : Accordingly (Please See Order for Further Details), the branch of the application that seeks to introduce new documents is denied, with leave to renew, unless Plaintiff stipulates to the introduction of the proposed new evidence. The p arties are advised to submit a joint letter on or before December 20, 2021, advising the Court whether Plaintiff consents to Defendants' application to introduce additional records when Mr. Parisi is re-called to testify, and if Plaintiff does n ot consent, if Defendants intend to renew the motion. If the latter, then the parties shall also submit a proposed briefing schedule regarding Defendants' request to reopen the evidentiary record. The continued trial with the recalling of Mr. Parisi is scheduled for January 19, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom 1020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 12/14/2021. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
