Mayer v. DeCarlo
Appellee: Anthony DeCarlo
Appellant: Ginette Mayer
Case Number: 2:2016cv01225
Filed: March 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: For the reasons set forth herein, the order of the Bankruptcy Court is vacated, and this action is remanded for further findings and proceedings consistent with this Memorandum and Order. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 3/2/2017. (Zbrozek, Alex)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mayer v. DeCarlo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Anthony DeCarlo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Ginette Mayer
Represented By: Craig D. Robins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?