Drew-King v. Deep Distributors of Greater NY, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Drew-King v. Deep Distributors of Greater NY, Inc.

Drew-King v. Deep Distributors of Greater NY, Inc.

Petitioner:	Kathy Drew-King
Respondent:	Deep Distributors of Greater NY, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2016cv01916
Filed:	April 19, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Sandra J. Feuerstein
Presiding Judge:	A. Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 5, 2016	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons(PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), the petition for a temporary injunction pursuant to Section 10(j) of the Act is granted. The Court finds that there is reasonable cause to believe Respondent engag ed in unfair labor practices in violations of Sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the Act, and that injunctive relief is just and proper. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent, its officers, agents, representatives, servants, employees, attorneys , successors, and assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participation with them, pending final disposition of the matters involved herein pending before the Board shall: Please see Order for further details. The petition having been granted, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/5/2016. (Ortiz, Grisel)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 5, 2016

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons(PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), the petition for a temporary injunction pursuant to Section 10(j) of the Act is granted. The Court finds that there is reasonable cause to believe Respondent engag ed in unfair labor practices in violations of Sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the Act, and that injunctive relief is just and proper. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent, its officers, agents, representatives, servants, employees, attorneys , successors, and assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participation with them, pending final disposition of the matters involved herein pending before the Board shall: Please see Order for further details. The petition having been granted, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/5/2016. (Ortiz, Grisel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Drew-King v. Deep Distributors of Greater NY, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Deep Distributors of Greater NY, Inc.
Represented By:	Saul D. Zabell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kathy Drew-King
Represented By:	Emily A Cabrera
Represented By:	Henry J. Powell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?