Chichester v. New York State, Department of Education, Adult Career and Continuing Education Services - Vocational Rehabilitation (ACCES-VR) 2:2016cv02508 | US District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Chichester v. New York State, Department of Education, Adult Career and Continuing Education Services - Vocational Rehabilitation (ACCES-VR)

Chichester v. New York State, Department of Education, Adult Career and Continuing Education Services - Vocational Rehabilitation (ACCES-VR)

Plaintiff:	Florence Chichester
Defendant:	New York State, Department of Education, Adult Career and Continuing Education Services - Vocational Rehabilitation (ACCES-VR)
Case Number:	2:2016cv02508
Filed:	May 17, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Sandra J. Feuerstein
Presiding Judge:	Steven I. Locke
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 17, 2017	Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that as to Plaintiff's first cause of action, Magistrate Judge Locke's Report is adopted in its entirety; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as to Plaintiff's se cond cause of action, the Plaintiff having withdrawn said cause of action, Magistrate Judge Locke's recommendations will not be considered; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the State's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is granted with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/17/2017. (Tirado, Chelsea)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 17, 2017

Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that as to Plaintiff's first cause of action, Magistrate Judge Locke's Report is adopted in its entirety; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as to Plaintiff's se cond cause of action, the Plaintiff having withdrawn said cause of action, Magistrate Judge Locke's recommendations will not be considered; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the State's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is granted with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/17/2017. (Tirado, Chelsea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chichester v. New York State, Department of Education, Adult Career and Continuing Education Services - Vocational Rehabilitation (ACCES-VR)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Florence Chichester
Represented By:	Lloyd Somer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New York State, Department of Education, Adult Career and Continuing Education Services - Vocational Rehabilitation (ACCES-VR)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?