Paez et al v. Whaleneck Enterprises et al
Ramon A. Jimenez Peralta, Rafael Luna, Aquiles V Nunez and Juan Paez |
Lindsay Magill and Whaleneck Enterprises |
2:2016cv02673 |
May 26, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Arthur D. Spatt |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER re 16 Motion for Settlement; 17 Motion for Reconsideration. Upon reconsideration, the Court finds that in this particular situation, judicial approval of the Defendants offer of judgment pursuant to Rule 68 is unnecessary. Rule 68 explicitly states that after either party files a notice of acceptance of an offer of judgment, the Clerk of the Court must then enter judgment. This Court will not ignore such plainly mandatory language; holding otherwise would constitute a judicial rewriting of Rule 68. Arzeno v. Big B World, Inc., 317 F.R.D. 440, 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) Accordingly, this Court joins the majority of district courts in this Circuit [that] have held that judicial approval is not required for R ule 68 offers of judgment. Anwar, 2017 WL 455416 at *1. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs consistent with the notice of acceptance [ECF No. 15], and to close the case. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. It is SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 6/14/2017. (Coleman, Laurie) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.