Schwartz v. Schwartz et al
Plaintiff: Robert I. Schwartz
Defendant: John Doe Nos. "1-10" and Richard A. Schwartz
Case Number: 2:2016cv02743
Filed: May 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Anne Y. Shields
Presiding Judge: Arthur D. Spatt
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. On August 28, 2017, Judge Shields issued a Report and Recommendation (the R&R), recommending that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be granted, and that the Defendant's affirmative defens es by dismissed with prejudice. Judge Shields further recommended that the Court grant the Plaintiff's motion to amend the caption to substitute Jackie Schwartz for John Doe No. 1 and to strike the Defendants John Doe No. 2 through John Doe No. 10 from the caption and dismiss them from this action. Finally, Judge Shields recommended that the Court deny without prejudice the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Jackie Schwartz, with leave to renew within 30 days of the Distri ct Courts adoption order after obtaining a certificate of default from the Clerk of the Court. It has been more than fourteen days since the filing of the R&R, and the parties have not filed objections. As such, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) an d Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. See Coburn v. P.N. Fin., No. 13-CV-1006 (ADS) (SIL), 2015 WL 520346, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2015) (reviewing Report and Recommendation without objections for clear error). Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 9/12/2017. (Fell, Christopher)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schwartz v. Schwartz et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Nos. "1-10"
Represented By: Ronald David Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard A. Schwartz
Represented By: Ronald David Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert I. Schwartz
Represented By: Lee Jeffrey Mendelson
Represented By: Kelly Dana Schneid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?