Cabrera v. Stephens et al
Plaintiff: Ines Cabrera
Defendant: Attaullah Khan and Christopher Stephens
Case Number: 2:2016cv03234
Filed: June 17, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Steven I. Locke
Presiding Judge: Arthur D. Spatt
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying DE 31 , Motion to Strike, and granting in part and denying in part DE 22 , Motion to Certify FLSA Collective Action. For the reasons set forth in the attached written order, the Court grants in part and denies in part, Plaintiffs' ; Motion for Conditional Certification as follows: (1) Conditionally Certifying this case as a collective action including any and all of Defendants' current and former non-managerial employees who were employed from 2/20/2014 through to the pre sent at any of Defendants locations; (2) Order Defendants, within sixty days of the Court's Order, to produce a computer-readable data file containing the names, last known mailing addresses, last known home and mobile telephone numbers, last kn own email addresses, work locations, and dates of employment, of all potential collective action members who worked for Defendants at any point from 2/20/2014 to the present; (3) The notice of this action, in the form submitted, will be in English an d Spanish, and sent via regular mail as well as text message and e-mail; (4) Defendants will post the Notice and Reminder Notice in English and Spanish in a place where employees are likely to view it all 7-Eleven store locations owned and/or operate d by Defendants for the entire opt-in period; (5) Plaintiffs will send the proposed reminder notice in both English and Spanish to the potential collective members thirty days after sending the initial notice, via regular mail, text message and e-mai l; and (6) The FLSA statute of limitations is tolled from the date of filing of this motion, until the date of the issuance of this order. Additionally, Plaintiffs' motions to strike and preclude the Affidavits and Declarations are denied in their entirety. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/28/2017. (Perri, Anthony)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cabrera v. Stephens et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ines Cabrera
Represented By: Michael J. Borrelli
Represented By: Alexander T. Coleman
Represented By: Michael R. Minkoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Attaullah Khan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?