Fortgang et al v. Pereiras Architects Ubiquitous LLC et al
| Rivka Fortgang and Seth Fortgang |
| Friedman Group LLC, Pereiras Architects Ubiquitous LLC, Ari Schwartz and Daniella Schwartz |
| 2:2016cv03754 |
| July 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Anne Y. Shields |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the Court finds that the Plaintiffs' objections are improper and therefore reviews the R&R for clear error. The Court finds no clear error. Further, the Court also concurs with the R&R after conducting a de novo review. Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety and the Plaintiffs' objections are denied. SEE DECISION for further details. It is SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/27/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
26
DECISION & ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss; granting 17 Motion to Dismiss. Based on the foregoing, the Court grants the Defendants motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety. If, by February 20, 2017, the Plaintiffs have not filed a formal motion for leave to amend the complaint, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. It is SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 1/20/2017. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
