Costanzo v. The County of Suffolk et al
Plaintiff: Irena Costanzo
Defendant: Correction Officer Santa Cruz, Nurse Jane Doe, Correction Officer Jane Doe #1, Correction Officers John Doe #1-#5, Suffolk County Sheriff's Department and The County of Suffolk
Case Number: 2:2016cv03871
Filed: July 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joan M. Azrack
Presiding Judge: Arlene R. Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 71 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: Irena Costanzos death was tragic, and the Court offers its condolences to her family. However, for the reasons set forth above, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to prove her excessive force claim by a preponderance of the evidence. As a result, Defendants are not liable to Plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because Plaintiffs excessive force claim fails, her motion to amend, (ECF No. 68 ), is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case. SEE ATTACHED for further details. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 6/29/2023. (LC)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM & ORDER - For the reasons set forth above (SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details), Defendants' 50 motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants summary judgment as to the following claims: delibera te indifference to Plaintiff-Decedent's medical needs in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; deprivation of liberty under the Fourteenth Amendment; sex-based discrimination under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments; and Due Process violation s under the Fourteenth Amendment. Because Defendants' summary judgment motion on the due process claim is granted, Suffolk County and the Suffolk County Sheriff's Department are dismissed from the case. The Court also dismisses individual D efendant Walker from the case. The Court denies summary judgment as to the excessive force claim against the other individual defendants. Rena Walker, Suffolk County Sheriff's Department and The County of Suffolk terminated. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 3/11/2022. (Coleman, Laurie)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Costanzo v. The County of Suffolk et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irena Costanzo
Represented By: Simon Heller
Represented By: Laura Solinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correction Officer Santa Cruz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nurse Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correction Officer Jane Doe #1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correction Officers John Doe #1-#5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Suffolk County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The County of Suffolk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?