Dubin v. The County Of Nassau et al
| Benjamin Dubin |
| The County Of Nassau, The Nassau County Legislature and The Nassau County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency |
| 2:2016cv04209 |
| July 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F. Bianco |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 28 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part defendants' motion to dismiss. With plaintiffs' consent, the Court dismisses defendant TPVA and plaintiffs' Article 78 claim (Count 20 of the SAC). In addition, the Court dismisses plaintiffs' bill of attainder, procedural due process, substantive due process, unjust takings, equal protection, and double jeopardy claims under Section 1983 for failure to state a claim with leave to amend. The Court denies defendants' motion with respect to the excessive fines claim. Any amended complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Memorandum and Order. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/27/2017. (Zbrozek, Alex)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
