McCollum v. City of New York
| Darius McCollum |
| City of New York, New York City Department of Correction, New York City Police Department and Honorable Betty Williams |
| 2:2016cv05272 |
| September 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F. Bianco |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, Defendants' 63 motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is GRANTED, and the complaint is dismissed in its entirety. In light of his pro se status, Plaint iff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the entry of this memorandum and order. See Cruz v. Gomez, 202 F.3d 593 (2d Cir. 2000). The amended complaint must be captioned Amended Complaint and bear the same docket number as this memorandum and order. Failure to file an amended complaint within 30 days, as directed by this memorandum and order, will result in dismissal of Plaintiffs case for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this memorandum and order to the pro se litigant. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 11/25/2020. (Williams, Erica)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
