New Falls Corporation v. Soni
Plaintiff: New Falls Corporation
Defendant: Om P. Soni
Case Number: 2:2016cv06805
Filed: December 9, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Arthur D. Spatt
Presiding Judge: A. Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 254 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff's Article III standing is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment with respect to its s tanding to enforce payment on the Note is GRANTED, and Defendant's cross-motion concerning the same is DENIED. The parties are directed to submit their joint pre-trial order in accordance with Section VI.B of the Court's Individual Practices by April 26, 2024. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/22/2024. (RCM)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 206 ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the Court orders as follows: Defendant's motion seeking permission to serve document subpoenas on The Cadle Co., Inc. and The Cadle Co. II, Inc. is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Defendant's moti on seeking permission to serve deposition subpoenas on The Cadle Co., Inc. and The Cadle Co. II, Inc. is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Defendant's motion seeking permission to serve additional documents and deposition subpoenas is DENIED WITHOUT PRE JUDICE; Plaintiff's apparent motion seeking reconsideration of Judge Tomlinson's 5/29/2020 decision rejecting Plaintiff's motion to compel regarding Defendant's individual tax returns is DENIED; Plaintiff's motion seeking per mission to serve a document subpoena on Alan Grossman is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; Plaintiff's motion seeking permission to serve a deposition subpoena on Alan Grossman is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Plaintiff's motion seeking permission to serv e a document subpoena on Soni Capital Resources, LLC is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and Plaintiff's motion seeking permission to serve a deposition on Soni Capital Resources, LLC is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further submission from Plaintiff due 1/13/2023. SO Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 12/19/2022. (CT)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 198 ORDER: The Court herein supplements its 11/10/2022 Orders in 16-CV-6805 (DE 197 ) and 19-CV-449 (DE 184 ) and ORDERS as follows: (See Order for details and instructions). SO Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 11/17/2022. (CT)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 191 ORDER re 190 Status Report. (See Order for details). SO Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 10/17/2022. (CT)
May 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 153 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to compel [DE 121] is DENIED; Defendant's cross-motion for a protective order [DE 138] is GRANTED; Plaintiff's motion for leave to move for contempt against the IRS [DE 146] is DENIED; Defendan t's motion to enforce the Stipulation and Order of Confidentiality or, alternatively, for a protective order [DE 147] and non-party Anjali Soni's motion as joinder [DE 149] is DENIED; and Plaintiff's motion to retain unredacted documents [DE 150] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, to the extent provided in this Order. SEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 5/29/2020. (Tomlinson, A.)
February 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER: For the above stated reasons, the Plaintiff's 21 motion pursuant to Rule 72 for a modification of the August 2, 2017 order is denied in its entirety. This case is respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson for the remainder of discovery. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. It is SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/13/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)
October 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Order re 22 Motion for Contempt. The motion is DENIED, without prejudice. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 10/30/2017. (Cento, Patrick)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: New Falls Corporation v. Soni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: New Falls Corporation
Represented By: Stephen Vlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Om P. Soni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?