KBM Worldwide, Inc. v. ERF Wireless Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District KBM Worldwide, Inc. v. ERF Wireless Inc.

KBM Worldwide, Inc. v. ERF Wireless Inc.

Plaintiff:	KBM Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:	ERF Wireless Inc.
Case Number:	2:2017cv00854
Filed:	February 15, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Anne Y. Shields
Presiding Judge:	Arthur D. Spatt
Nature of Suit:	Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 14, 2018	Filing 16 ADOPTION ORDER: More than fourteen ( 14) days have elapsed since service of the R&R on the Defendant, who have failed to file an objection. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the R&R fo r clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. There being no objection to Judge Shields' R&R, it is hereby ORDERED, that Judge Shields' Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety. The Court (1) grants the Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment; (2) awards the Plaintiff $224,065.00 in damages; and (3) awards post-judgment interest to the Plaintiff; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiff as set forth above. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/14/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 14, 2018

Filing 16 ADOPTION ORDER: More than fourteen ( 14) days have elapsed since service of the R&R on the Defendant, who have failed to file an objection. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the R&R fo r clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. There being no objection to Judge Shields' R&R, it is hereby ORDERED, that Judge Shields' Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety. The Court (1) grants the Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment; (2) awards the Plaintiff $224,065.00 in damages; and (3) awards post-judgment interest to the Plaintiff; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiff as set forth above. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/14/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KBM Worldwide, Inc. v. ERF Wireless Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ERF Wireless Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KBM Worldwide, Inc.
Represented By:	Richard S. Naidich
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?