The Oneida Group Inc. v. Steelite International U.S.A. Inc. et al
| The Oneida Group Inc. |
| Anthony DeLosReyes, Richard Erwin, Steven Lefkowitz, Steelite International U.S.A. Inc. and Tablewerks, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv00957 |
| February 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
ORDER re DE 151 and 152 clarifying the Court's previous Order with respect to ESI custodians. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 6/26/2018. (Cento, Patrick)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated above, the Steelite Defendants' motion to dismiss Oneida's claims for misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is denied in its entirety; t he Tablewerks Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is granted and Oneida's claims for tortious interference with business relations against those Defendants is dismissed without prejudice with leave to replead within thi rty days; Steelite Distribution's motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 24 is granted to the extent that it is entitled to permissive intervention; and Oneidas motion to amend its complaint pursuant to Rule 15 is granted except to the extent th at it seeks to add claims against Steelite Distribution--as stated above, those claims must be brought as counterclaims. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to amend the official caption to reflect the following: (see "Decision" ). Oneida is directed to file an amended complaint within thirty days that complies with the dictates of this order; and if it wishes to do so, it may amend its claims for tortious interference with business relations against the Tablewerks Defendants. This matter is respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson for the remainder of discovery. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 12/15/2017. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - For the following reasons, Oneidas motion for a preliminary injunction is denied; the temporary restraining order is vacated; and Oneidas motion for expedited discovery is granted SEE ATTACHED DECISION for further details. This case is respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge Tomlinson for the remainder of discovery. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 5/10/2017. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
