Clarkes et al v. Hughes
Cassondra Church, Alicia Clarkes, Juanita Clarkes, Samantha Clarkes, Joyce Holley, Claudia McDonald, Susan Murphy, Paula Ross, Jamal Smart and Holly Young |
Michael G. Hughes |
2:2017cv00961 |
February 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Joan M. Azrack |
Anne Y. Shields |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Re: For the forgoing reasons(PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), the amended complaint is sua sponte dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3). Th e Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs state law claims and any such claims are also dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case and to mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiffs at their last known addresses. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that, should plaintiffs seek leave to appeal in forma pauperis, such status for the purpose of an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 10/30/2018. (Ortiz, Grisel) (c/m to all Pro se) (Florio, Lisa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.