Community Association Underwriters of America, Inc. v. Advanced Chimney Inc. et al
| Community Association Underwriters of America, Inc. |
| Advanced Chimney Inc. and Advanced Maintenance, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv01207 |
| March 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Gary R. Brown |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER: The Court hereby refers this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown for a recommendation as to whether the motion for a default judgment should be granted, and if so, whether damages should be awarded. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to note the referral. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 9/27/2018. Motion 66 referred to Judge Gary R. Brown. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting 30 Motion to Consolidate. ORDERED that the March 5, 2018 letter motion to consolidate Case Numbers 17-cv- 01207 and 17-cv-6710 is granted; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to consolidate the two actions set forth above under Case Number 17-cv-01207 and Case Number 17-cv-6710 is to be closed; and it is further ORDERED that the consolidated action shall proceed under Case Number 17-cv-01207, and that all filings are to be made only under Case Number 17-cv-01207; and it is further ORDERED that the Plaintiffs in each action are directed to file, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, a Consolidated Complaint incorporating the claims of the Complaint in the Firs t Filed Action and the Complaint in the Second Filed Action. The Consolidated Complaint shall not assert new allegations against the Defendants and the Defendants, having answered the Complaints in the First Filed Action and the Second Filed Action, will be under no obligation to file additional answers to the Consolidated Complaint; and it is further ORDERED that the Defendants are directed to file, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, a Consolidated Third Party Complaint incorporati ng the claims of the Third Party Complaint in the First Filed Action and the Third Party Complaint in the Second Filed Action.The Consolidated Third Party Complaint shall not assert new allegations against the Third Party Defendants. Third Party Defe ndants that have already answered the Complaints in the First Filed Action and the Second Filed Action will be under no obligation to file additional answers to the Consolidated Third Party Complaint. Third Party Defendants who are required to answer by October 4, 2018 shall answer by the later of October 4, 2018 or seven days after the filing of the Consolidated Third Party Complaint. This Order shall not affect the deadlines for any Third Party Defendants subject to a motion seeking a default judgment against them. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 9/21/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
