Hallmark Licensing, LLC et al v. Dickens Inc.
| Hallmark Licensing, LLC and Hallmark Marketing Company, LLC |
| Dickens Inc. |
| 2:2017cv02149 |
| April 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Anne Y. Shields |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Hallmarks Motion 92 is GRANTED, and Dickens Motion 114 is DENIED; andIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, at the October 27, 2020 telephonic Status Conference scheduled to c ommence at 10:00 a.m., the Parties are to be prepared to address Hallmarks remaining claims and its Prayer for Relief. Chambers teleconferencing number is (877) 336-1280, and the access code is 7215690. So Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 10/21/2020. (Cubano, Jazmin)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion to Compel. Defendant's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part and Plaintiff's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part. See the attached Order for additional details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 12/13/2018. (Mucciaccio, Dina)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
