Shetel Industries LLC v. Adin Dental Implant Systems, Inc. et al
| Shetel Industries LLC |
| Adin Dental Implant Systems, Inc., Adin Dental Solutions USA, Inc. and Jeremy Danzer |
| 2:2017cv02505 |
| April 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the reasons set forth above, Danzers claims against Weitz for unjust enrichment and conversion (seventeenth and eighteenth third party claims, respectively) are dismissed in their entirety and the Shetel Parties are granted summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing Danzers claim against Weitz for promissory estoppel (fourteenth third-party claim) in its entirety with prejudice. Accordingly, the third-party complaint is d ismissed in its entirety with prejudice. For the sake of clarity, in addition to Shetels claims against the Adin Parties, the following claims by the Adin Parties remain in this action: (i) Adins and Danzers breach of contract counterclaims against S hetel (first and eighteenth counterclaims, respectively); (ii) Adins conversion counterclaim against Shetel (fifth counterclaim); and (iii) Danzers counterclaim against Shetel alleging a violation of Section 191(c) of the New York State Labor Law (tw enty-second counterclaim). There being no just reason for delay, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Weitz pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/23/2021. (Cubano, Jazmin)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons set forth above, the Shetel Parties motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted to the extent that the Shetel Parties are granted summary judgment dismissing the Adin Parties: (i) second, third, fourth, sixth through fourteenth, sixteenth, nineteenth through twenty-first, twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth counterclaims against Shetel, (ii) first through eighth, eleventh through t hirteenth, fifteenth and sixteenth third-party claims against Weitz, and (iii) third-party claims against Osseogroup in their entirety, with prejudice; and the motion is otherwise denied. For the sake of clarity, the following counterclaims and third -party claims remain in this action: (i) Adins and Danzers breach of contract counterclaims against Shetel (first and eighteenth counterclaims, respectively), Adins conversion counterclaim against Shetel (fifth counterclaim), and Danzers counterclaim against Shetel alleging a violation of Section 191(c) of the New York State Labor Law (twenty-second counterclaim); and (ii) Danzers promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment and conversion claims (fourteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth third-party cla ims) against Weitz. There being no just reason for delay, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Osseogroup pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 9/30/2020. (Cubano, Jazmin)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
