Williams v. Mangano et al
Jessica Ashley Williams |
Detective William Bourguignon, Detective Hector Bourren, Detective Jason Collins, Detective Stephen Firestone, Edward P. Mangano, Detective James Marinucci, Detective Silvia Marquez, Detective Leonard Mathewson, Police Commissioner Jane Doe, Detective Damian Suarez and Detective Jason Wrieske |
2:2017cv02667 |
April 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Joseph F. Bianco |
A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons in the attached memorandum, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to all claims against Bourren, Wrieske, Coll ins, Suarez, and Mathewson; and granted with respect to the false arrest and malicious prosecution claims against Bourguignon. Defendants motion for summary judgment is denied with respect to the unlawful search claim against Bourguignon. This acti on is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Tomlinson for all remaining pre-trial matters, including settlement discussions if appropriate. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se plaintiff and to note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 1/11/2021. (Taronji, Robert) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.