Blackout Merch, LLC v. John Does 1-100 et al
| Blackout Merch, LLC |
| Jane Does 1-100, XYZ Company and John Does 1-100 |
| 2:2017cv02764 |
| May 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Sandra J Feuerstein |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #6 Motion for TRO; granting #6 Motion for Order to Show Cause - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants, John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100, and XYZ Company their true identities being unknown (collectively "Defendants"), show cause before the Honorable Sandra J. Feuerstein, USDJ, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, at 11AM on 5/22/2017 or as soon thereafter as counsel an be heard, why an order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 65, the Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 1051 et. seq., and the All Writs Act 28 U.S.C. 1651 should not be entered granting to Plaintiff, Blackout Merch, LLC, a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Defendants from manufacturing, distributing, selling, or holding for sale, any clothing, jewelry, photographs, posters, and other merchandise (collectively the "Infringing Merchandise") and to seize the same bearing the federally registered trademarks, service marks, and likenesses, logos and other inidicia of the Group "Metallica" (collectively, the "Group's Trademarks"). AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order be and is hereby conditioned upon Plaintiff's filing with the Clerk of this Court an undertaking in the form of a bond, certified check, or cash in the amount of $500 no later than 5PM on 5/11/2017, to secure the payment of such costs and damages not to exceed such sum as may be suffered or sustained by any party who is found to be wrongfully restrained hereby. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/8/2017. (Tirado, Chelsea)
|
| Filing 11 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Cara R. Burns in Support re #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Order to Show Cause for preliminary injuction and seizure filed by Blackout Merch, LLC. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of Thomas Donnell in Support re #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Order to Show Cause for preliminary injuction and seizure filed by Blackout Merch, LLC. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Order to Show Cause for preliminary injuction and seizure filed by Blackout Merch, LLC. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order , MOTION for Order to Show Cause for preliminary injuction and seizure by Blackout Merch, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Francesco Sardone Esq. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to XYZ Company. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Jane Does 1-100. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to John Does 1-100. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Blackout Merch, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 22656 (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
