Wu v. Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, et al
| Serena Wu |
| Catholic Health Services of Long Island, Jonathon Goldstein, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, Madonna Perinatal Services and Benjamin Schwartz |
| 2:2017cv04247 |
| July 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - For the reasons set forth above, plaintiff's objections to the Report's findings relating to her retaliation claim under Section 215 of the NYLL are sustained and those findings are rejected; plai ntiff's objections are otherwise overruled and the remainder of the Report is accepted in its entirety; and, for the reasons set forth herein and in the Report, defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiff's claims against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are granted and plaintiff's claims are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close this case. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/2/2019. (Tirado, Chelsea)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
