Carey v. Ripp
Stanley J. Carey |
Robert Ripp |
2:2017cv04899 |
August 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Steven I Locke |
Arthur D Spatt |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER - For the above stated reasons, the Plaintiff's #4 motion to remand the case back to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County is granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. It is SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/28/2018. (Coleman, Laurie) |
CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. (Coleman, Laurie) |
Filing 13 Letter motion from Melissa Sanderleaf, Esq. to Hon. Arthur D. Spatt requesting oral argument on the motion to remand by Stanley J. Carey (Sanderleaf, Melissa) Modified on 11/16/2017 to change event type to motion. (Coleman, Laurie). |
Filing 12 Letter MOTION to Adjourn Conference Letter from E. Christopher Murray to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke regarding the status of the matter and to request that the initial conference remain sine die until the motion to remand is decided by Stanley J. Carey. (Murray, E.) |
Filing 11 Letter from E. Christopher Murray, Esq. to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke regarding the status of the matter by Stanley J. Carey (Murray, E.) |
Electronic ORDER granting DE #10 Motion to Adjourn Conference. On consent, and in light of the pending Motion to Remand to State Court, DE #4 , the initial conference scheduled for 10/19/17 is adjourned sine die. The Parties are directed to file a joint status report with the Court on or before 11/6/17. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 10/6/2017. (Budhu, Ryan) |
Filing 10 Letter MOTION to Adjourn Conference Letter from Joseph R. Harbeson, Esq. to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke requesting an adjournment of the Initial Conference pending resolution of the motion to remand by Stanley J. Carey. (Harbeson, Joseph) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph R. Harbeson on behalf of Stanley J. Carey (aty to be noticed) (Harbeson, Joseph) |
Filing 8 REPLY in Support re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Stanley J. Carey. (Murray, E.) |
Filing 7 REPLY in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by All Defendants. (Palmer, John) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Stanley J. Carey. (Murray, E.) |
Filing 5 Letter from Melissa Starcic, Esq. to Hon. Arthur D. Spatt requesting oral argument of plaintiff's motion to remand by Stanley J. Carey (Murray, E.) Modified docket text, attorney's name who the letter is from, on 9/11/2017 (Florio, Lisa). |
Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Stanley J. Carey. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of E. Christopher Murray, Esq., #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E) (Murray, E.) |
Filing 3 INITIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 10/19/2017 in Courtroom 820 before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. See order and attachments. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/8/2017. (Attachments: #1 SIL Individual Rules, #2 Scheduling Order Worksheet) (Gandiosi, Kristin) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Robert Ripp from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County, case number 607713/2017. Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit Part One, #5 Exhibit Part Two) (Cox, Dwayne) (Attachment 3 replaced on 8/24/2017) (Cox, Dwayne). Modified to correct list of exhibits on 8/25/2017 (Cox, Dwayne). |
FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 23418 (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carey v. Ripp | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stanley J. Carey | |
Represented By: | Melissa Starcic |
Represented By: | E. Christopher Murray |
Represented By: | Melissa Sanderleaf |
Represented By: | Joseph R. Harbeson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Robert Ripp | |
Represented By: | John W. Palmer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.