McCluskey v. Imhof et al
Plaintiff: Peter McCluskey
Defendant: John Imhof, Darla P. Oto, Samual D. Roberts and Mrs. Ryan
Case Number: 2:2017cv05873
Filed: October 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge: Arlene R. Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 59 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement; denying 62 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, McCluskey's motions 1) to alter or amend the judgment pursu ant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 2) to file a supplemental pleading pursuant Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d) are denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se plaintiff and to note that mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/30/2019. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, after a de novo review, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. Thus, defendants' motions to dismiss are granted, and plaintiff's motions for sanctions are denied. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff, and file proof of service with the Court. The Court certifies purs uant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that, should plaintiff seek leave to appeal in forma pauperis, any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is therefore denied for the purpose of any appeal.Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 9/21/2018. (Bollbach, Jean)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCluskey v. Imhof et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Imhof
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darla P. Oto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samual D. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mrs. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter McCluskey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?