Stulsky v. Micalizzi

Stulsky v. Micalizzi

Plaintiff:	Christine A. Stulsky
Defendant:	Gerald J. Micalizzi
Case Number:	2:2017cv05972
Filed:	October 12, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Gary R. Brown
Presiding Judge:	Leonard D. Wexler
Nature of Suit:	Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 18, 2018	Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the March 29, 2018 motion to consolidate Case Numbers 16-CV-3804 and 17-CV-5972 is granted; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to consolidate the two actions set forth above under Case Number 16-CV-3804 and Case Number 17CV5972 is to be closed; and it is further ORDERED that the consolidated action shall proceed under Case Number 16-CV-3804, and that all filings are to be made only under Case Number 16-CV-380 4; and it is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff is directed to file, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, a Consolidated Complaint incorporating the claims of the Complaint in the First Filed Action and the Complaint in the Second Filed Ac tion. The Consolidated Complaint shall not assert new allegations against the Defendants and the Defendants, having answered the Complaints in the First Filed Action and the Second Filed Action, will be under no obligation to file additional answers to the Consolidated Complaint. SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 10/18/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 18, 2018

Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the March 29, 2018 motion to consolidate Case Numbers 16-CV-3804 and 17-CV-5972 is granted; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to consolidate the two actions set forth above under Case Number 16-CV-3804 and Case Number 17CV5972 is to be closed; and it is further ORDERED that the consolidated action shall proceed under Case Number 16-CV-3804, and that all filings are to be made only under Case Number 16-CV-380 4; and it is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff is directed to file, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, a Consolidated Complaint incorporating the claims of the Complaint in the First Filed Action and the Complaint in the Second Filed Ac tion. The Consolidated Complaint shall not assert new allegations against the Defendants and the Defendants, having answered the Complaints in the First Filed Action and the Second Filed Action, will be under no obligation to file additional answers to the Consolidated Complaint. SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 10/18/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stulsky v. Micalizzi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gerald J. Micalizzi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine A. Stulsky
Represented By:	Harry H. Kutner, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?