Jones v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Jones v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department

Jones v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department

Plaintiff:	Stepney Jones
Defendant:	Suffolk County Sheriff Department
Case Number:	2:2017cv06056
Filed:	October 16, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Joan M. Azrack
Presiding Judge:	Steven I. Locke
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 7, 2019	Filing 21 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Accordingly (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 3/7/2019.(c/m to pro se) (Ortiz, Grisel)
January 8, 2018	Filing 12 ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED that the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. However, plaintiff's complaint is dismissed sua sponte in its entirety pursuant to 28 U. S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim for relief. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint in accordance with this Order. Any amended complaint must be clearly labeled Amended Complaint, bear the same docket number as this Order, 17-CV-6056(JMA)(SIL), and shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that an amended complaint completely replaces the original. Therefore, plaintiff must include a ll claims against any defendants he seeks to pursue in the amended complaint. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within the time allowed, judgment shall enter and this case will be closed. The Court declines to exercise supplemental juri sdiction over any remaining state law claims alleged in the complaint and therefore the state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 1/8/2018. (CM to pro se plaintiff) (Florio, Lisa)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 7, 2019

Filing 21 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Accordingly (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 3/7/2019.(c/m to pro se) (Ortiz, Grisel)

January 8, 2018

Filing 12 ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED that the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. However, plaintiff's complaint is dismissed sua sponte in its entirety pursuant to 28 U. S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim for relief. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint in accordance with this Order. Any amended complaint must be clearly labeled Amended Complaint, bear the same docket number as this Order, 17-CV-6056(JMA)(SIL), and shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned that an amended complaint completely replaces the original. Therefore, plaintiff must include a ll claims against any defendants he seeks to pursue in the amended complaint. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within the time allowed, judgment shall enter and this case will be closed. The Court declines to exercise supplemental juri sdiction over any remaining state law claims alleged in the complaint and therefore the state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 1/8/2018. (CM to pro se plaintiff) (Florio, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stepney Jones
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Suffolk County Sheriff Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?