Tenaha Licensing LLC v. Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
| Tenaha Licensing LLC |
| Napco Security Technologies, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv06399 |
| November 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F Bianco |
| Gary R Brown |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Tenaha Licensing LLC (Watson, Coleman) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tenaha Licensing LLC (Watson, Coleman) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. Napco Security Technologies, Inc. served on 12/19/2017, answer due 2/8/2018. (Watson, Coleman) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The time for defendant Napco Security Technologies, Inc. to respond to the Complaint is extended to 2/8/2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown on 1/8/2018. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Napco Security Technologies, Inc.. (Mugno, John) |
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall for all further proceedings. Judge Joseph F. Bianco no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.. Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 11/30/2017. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
| CASE REASSIGNED INTO PATENT PILOT PROGRAM. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay no longer assigned to case. (McMahon, Carol) |
|
PATENT PILOT REASSIGNMENT ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case from the patent pilot wheel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 11/9/2017. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/8/2017: #1 Additional Corrections) (Rodin, Deanna). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joseph F. Bianco and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| This is a patent case and is eligible for the Patent Pilot Project. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Notice (Other), by Tenaha Licensing LLC (Watson, Coleman) |
| NOTICE :The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to forward a completed (2 Page Form)Civil Cover Sheet, answering all questions *** INCLUDING the NY-E Division of Business Rule 50.1(d)(2) section on the second page***. Please use the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Tenaha Licensing LLC (Watson, Coleman) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Tenaha Licensing LLC (Watson, Coleman) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Napco Security Technologies, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-9953172, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by Tenaha Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Watson, Coleman) Modified on 11/8/2017 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tenaha Licensing LLC v. Napco Security Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Napco Security Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John R. Mugno |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tenaha Licensing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Coleman Washington Watson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
