Davis v. County of Suffolk et al
| Stanley Davis |
| Thomas Clavin, County of Suffolk, New York State Unified Court System, State of New York and Town of Riverhead |
| 2:2018cv00303 |
| January 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joseph F. Bianco |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM & ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Town's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is denied leave to amend. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good f aith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). The Clerk of the Court directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff at his last known address. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 3/29/2022. c/m to pro se plaintiff (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, there is no good faith basis for Plaintiff's unauthorized interlocutory appeal. Accordingly, in forma pauperis status is revoked for the purposes any appeal of the Courts Electronic Orders dated April 15, 2021 and April 22, 2021, as well as the instant Order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Coppedge, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45. Any further request to proceed in forma pauperis for the purpose of appealing any of those orders must be directed to the United S tates Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 4/30/2021. c/m to pro se plaintiff (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court therefore adopts Judge Tomlinson's comprehensive and well-reasoned R&R in its entirety as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, (1) the County's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and (2) the State Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 12/1/2020. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
