Kaminski v. Visual ID Source, Inc. et al
| Wieslaw Kaminski |
| Adam Khalfan, Fayaz Khalfan, Mohammed Khalfan, Sameer Khalfan, Zaheer Khalfan and Visual ID Source, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00381 |
| January 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Gary R. Brown |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On October 6, 2020, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione filed a sua sponte Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. ECF No. 31 . Objections to the R&R were due October 20, 2020, and to date, no objections have been filed. In reviewing a report and recommendation, a distr ict court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where no objections have been filed, the Court reviews a report and recommendation fo r clear error. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007) (Garaufis, J.). The Court finds no such error here. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 10/29/2020. (Love, Alexis)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
