CIT Bank, N.A. v. McDonnell et al
CIT Bank, N.A. |
Cach LLC, George Fox, Karen McDonnell, Steven McDonnell, Public Administrator of Nassau County as Limited Administrator of the Estate of George Andrew Fox and Patricia Vivirito |
2:2018cv00476 |
January 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Joseph F. Bianco |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 74 Motion for Summary Judgment and adopting 86 Report and Recommendations: In conclusion, for the reasons discussed herein and discussed in detail in the R&R, the Clerk of Court is d irected to vacate the default previously entered against Defendant Karen McDonnell; Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied; Plaintiff's motion for default judgment as against Cach LLC is denied; and Plaintiff's motion for default judgment as against the Public Administrator of Nassau County, Patricia Vivirito, Debra Fox, Michael Fox, and Christina Fox Lord is granted, and those parties' respective interests in the Property are extinguished. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Bulsara to hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of compliance with RPAPL § 1304. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 3/2/2023. (EF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.