Stephenson v. RGS Financial, Inc.
Plaintiff: John G. Stephenson
Defendant: RGS Financial, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00942
Filed: February 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Denis R Hurley
Referring Judge: A Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The stipulation of dismissal, DE 27, is So Ordered and this case closed. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 7/28/2020. (Gapinski, Michele)
July 27, 2020 Filing 27 STIPULATION of Dismissal by John G. Stephenson (Cader, Jonathan)
July 23, 2020 Motions terminated, docketed incorrectly: #26 MOTION for pre motion conference filed by RGS Financial, Inc. (The document should have been filed as a "LETTER" application, and the Court will address the document as such. All corrections have been made). (Cubano, Jazmin)
July 23, 2020 Filing 26 Letter application for pre motion conference by RGS Financial, Inc.. (Little, Brendan) Modified on 7/24/2020 (Cubano, Jazmin).
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER re #24 Letter filed by RGS Financial, Inc.: The request is being held in abeyance pending a decision on the plaintiff's request to take the deposition of a 30(b)(6) witness. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 6/28/2019. (Gapinski, Michele)
May 23, 2019 Filing 25 Letter in opposition to Defendant's request for a pre-motion conference (Dkt. No. 24) by John G. Stephenson (Barshay, David)
May 13, 2019 Filing 24 Letter requesting a pre-motion conference for permission to move for summary judgment by RGS Financial, Inc. (Little, Brendan)
December 12, 2018 Filing 23 Letter opposing Plaintiff's request for a deposition by RGS Financial, Inc. (Little, Brendan)
December 11, 2018 Filing 22 Letter in response to the Court's text only Order of December 11, 2018 by John G. Stephenson (Cader, Jonathan)
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: The court has received the parties' application at DE #20 and is granting the request contained therein. Counsel have until the close of business today, December 11, 2018, to submit a letter to the Court confirming that all issues have been resolved. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 12/11/2018. (Degennaro, Christopher)
December 10, 2018 Filing 21 STATUS REPORT re: discovery in response to Magistrate Judge Tomlinson's Order and requesting leave to take a deposition of Defendant by John G. Stephenson (Cader, Jonathan)
December 7, 2018 Filing 20 Letter - discovery by RGS Financial, Inc. (Little, Brendan)
November 30, 2018 Filing 19 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson:Status Conference held on 11/30/2018. SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Degennaro, Christopher)
November 1, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER RE DE 17 and DE 18. The Court has reviewed both submissions and Defendant's counsel is directed to serve substantive responses to the Interrogatories previously served by Plaintiff by November 15, 2018. The Court is setting this case down for a telephone conference for November 21, 2018 at 1:15 p.m. to address completion of discovery. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to initiate the call to Chambers with opposing counsel on the line. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 11/1/2018. (Degennaro, Christopher)
October 30, 2018 Filing 18 Letter in Opposition to Defendant's Request for Leave to file motion for summary judgment by John G. Stephenson (Cader, Jonathan)
October 29, 2018 Filing 17 Letter - RGS summary judgment by RGS Financial, Inc. (Little, Brendan)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER re [14, 15]: Given Judge's Tomlinson's direction that she be notified if defendant intended to proceed with a request to make a Rule 56 motion and there being no such notification appearing on the docket, Defendant's request for a pre-motion conference is denied without prejudice. Defendant must comply with Judge Tomlinson's Order. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 10/26/2018. (Gapinski, Michele)
October 19, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Mark Cader on behalf of John G. Stephenson (aty to be noticed) (Cader, Jonathan)
October 19, 2018 Filing 15 Letter in response and in opposition to Defendant's request for pre-motion conference by John G. Stephenson (Barshay, David)
October 5, 2018 Motions terminated, docketed incorrectly: #14 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for permission to file a motion for summary judgment filed by RGS Financial, Inc. (The document should have been filed as a "LETTER" application, and the Court will address the document as such. All corrections have been made.) (Cubano, Jazmin)
October 5, 2018 Filing 14 Letter application for pre motion conference for permission to file a motion for summary judgment by RGS Financial, Inc.. (Little, Brendan) Modified on 10/9/2018 (Cubano, Jazmin).
June 4, 2018 Filing 13 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson: Initial Conference Hearing held on 6/4/2018. Counsel are directed to contact Chambers (631-712-5760) within three days of Judge Hurley's decision on defendant's anticipated Rule 12(c) motion if the motion is denied in whole or in part. Defendant's counsel intends to file a letter request for a pre-motion conference to Judge Hurley promptly. (McCuiston, Hannah)
June 1, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Conor Brownell on behalf of RGS Financial, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Brownell, Conor)
May 30, 2018 Filing 11 Proposed Scheduling Order by John G. Stephenson (Barshay, David)
May 23, 2018 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by RGS Financial, Inc. (Little, Brendan)
May 23, 2018 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by RGS Financial, Inc.. (Little, Brendan)
April 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant has until May 23, 2018 to answer or otherwise move with respect to the Complaint. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for additional details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 4/17/2018. (McCuiston, Hannah)
April 16, 2018 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by RGS Financial, Inc.. (Little, Brendan)
April 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for June 4, 2018 at 10 a.m. before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson in Courtroom 910 at 100 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York. No later than two business days before the Initial Conference, counsel for the parties must submit, by means of electronic filing on the court's ECF system, a Joint Proposed Discovery Plan. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for additional details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 4/11/2018. (McCuiston, Hannah)
March 21, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Barshay on behalf of John G. Stephenson (aty to be noticed) (Barshay, David)
February 21, 2018 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John G. Stephenson. RGS Financial, Inc. waiver sent on 2/20/2018, answer due 4/23/2018. (Sanders, Craig)
February 13, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to RGS Financial, Inc. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 13, 2018 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RGS Financial, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10197667 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by John G. Stephenson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Sanders, Craig)
February 13, 2018 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 13, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Denis R. Hurley and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephenson v. RGS Financial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RGS Financial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John G. Stephenson
Represented By: Craig B. Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?